Prediction of Barbara Potter vs Pam Teeguarden Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Potter vs P. Teeguarden

Barbara Potter

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Pam Teeguarden

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Potter 2 - 0 Teeguarden

They have played 4 sets in total, with Barbara Potter winning 4 and Pam Teeguarden winning 0. The last match between Barbara Potter and Pam Teeguarden was at the Seattle, 18-01-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Barbara Potter getting the victory 6-4 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Potter	2
Teeguarden	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) Seattle(01-18-82)

Stats

Barbara Potter

Pam Teeguarden

(R3) Sydney(11-23-81)

Stats

Barbara Potter

Pam Teeguarden

B. Potter vs P. Teeguarden H2H Profile

B. Potter	Stats	P. Teeguarden
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
61.16% (326-207)	Career Total W/L	47.87% (315-343)
1	Grass	0
1	Indoor	0
1	Titles	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Potter vs P. Teeguarden Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Barbara Potter has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pam Teeguarden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Barbara Potter, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pam Teeguarden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Barbara Potter has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pam Teeguarden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Barbara Potter has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Pam Teeguarden winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Barbara Potter has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 65% (W/L 62/33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 5/7). Pam Teeguarden has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 48/36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 54/63).
Player level: In the last year, Barbara Potter has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Pam Teeguarden has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Barbara Potter winning 2 times and Pam Teeguarden being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Barbara Potter winning 4 and Pam Teeguarden winning 0.
The last match between Barbara Potter and Pam Teeguarden was at the Seattle, 18-01-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Barbara Potter getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Barbara Potter has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pam Teeguarden has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Barbara Potter has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pam Teeguarden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Barbara Potter has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pam Teeguarden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Barbara Potter vs Pam Teeguarden Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Potter vs P. Teeguarden H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Potter	Stats	P. Teeguarden
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
25	Games Won	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Potter Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Worcester - 30-10-1989
R3 Gretchen MagersG. Magers	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Brighton - 23-10-1989
R4 Catarina Lindqvist RyanC. Lindqvist	L	6-3 7-6	Stats
R3 Sarah BentleyS. Bentley	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
Wichita - 20-02-1989
Leila MeskhiL. Meskhi	W	6-7 6-2 6-4	Stats
F Amy FrazierA. Frazier	L	4-6 6-4 6-0	Stats

View All

P. Teeguarden Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 27-05-1985
R1 Martina NavratilovaM. Navratilova	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Oakland - 18-02-1985
Q1 Molly Van NostrandM. Van	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Delray Beach - 05-02-1985
R1 Sabrina GolesS. Goles	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Marco Island - 28-01-1985
Q1 Catherine SuireC. Suire	L	2-6 7-5 6-0	Stats
Key Biscayne - 21-01-1985
Q1 Ginny PurdyG. Purdy	L	3-6 6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

B. Potter vs P. Teeguarden Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Potter	Stats	P. Teeguarden
61.16% (326/207)	YTD Win/Loss	47.87% (315/343)
60.38% (727/477)	Sets Win/Loss	48.86% (729/763)
53.71% (6166/5314)	Games Win/Loss	50.06% (6862/6846)
59.13% (68/47)	Hard Win/Loss	49.32% (72/74)
41.67% (5/7)	Clay Win/Loss	46.15% (54/63)
61.83% (149/92)	Indoor Hard W/L	39.62% (63/96)
60.00% (42/28)	Grass Win/Loss	57.14% (48/36)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
287.5	Average Opponent Rank	108.6
40.00% (2/3)	Slam W/L	57.14% (12/9)
80.00% (4/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
71.43% (10/4)	Challenger W/L	58.33% (7/5)
66.25% (53/27)	Futures W/L	49.64% (68/69)
61% (321/522)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	48% (307/646)
50% (1/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/2)
29% (4/14)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (6/12)
46% (69/150)	Deciding Set Win %	41% (78/191)
88% (325/285)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (325/266)
12% (325/39)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (325/59)
19% (203/39)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (326/42)